HE – Pillar III
Call Basics
Who can apply?
- Single legal entities
- Small consortia
From one single legal entity to consortia ≥2 beneficiaries in different member states or associated countries
What can you apply for?
- Up to approximately €4 million per project
- Funding is provided as a 100% grant covering eligible costs under a lump-sum funding model.
TThe overall indicative budget size is up to 4 M€, although >4 M€ can be requested when convincingly justified
Next deadline
28th of October 2026.
Most common reasons for rejection
Unconvincing market potential and technology uptake
Lack a convincing long-term vision for a breakthrough technology
Weak alignment with the call’s defined challenge
The proposal does not fully address the challenge and some of the key elements are only superficially addressed
Overambition
The project presents an ambitious approach to resolve the challenge without a credible and realistic scientific basis or methodology
Underdeveloped high-risk/high-gain logic
Fail to articulate the high-risk/high-gain nature and scientific logic of the research
Lack or redundancy in expertise within the partners
The consortium composition either has know-how gaps or redundancies between partners
Issues with the integration of disciplines in the project
The project’s narrative fails to integrate the different pieces of research into a cohesive and coherent breakthrough project
Readability issues
The proposal is difficult to read: complicated organisation of ideas, intricate text flow, or language not adapted to the audience
How we can help you maximise your chances of success
We analyse how well your proposal addresses the following critical points:
Challenge alignement
Ensuring your project aligns precisely with the chosen Challenge’s scope and objectives
Project objectives
The defined project objectives are clear, specific, innovative, ambitious, and suitable to address the call’s challenge with a transformative technology
Science-toward-technology breakthrough
The innovation, originality, and, high-risk/high-gain character of the scientific approach and project idea to build the proposed transformative technology
Feasibility of the proposed project
The approach, methodology and research plan, as well as its work plan are coherent, realistic and effective
Composition of the consortium
The consortium possesses the appropriate expertise to deliver the proposed proof of concept technology
Interdisciplinarity
The scientific project is balanced and blends the consortium’s expertise together in a well-integrated project
Pathways toward impacts
The proposal describes a convincing path for the long-term vision of the project, connecting it with the proposed technology’s societal, economic, and technological impacts of the project
Text flow
The proposal is well-structured, easy to read, and enjoyable, and presents a coherent flow of ideas.
More generally…
We will also assess the description of the gender dimension, open science measures, data and research output management, dissemination, communication, and exploitation.